Aesthetics in the Shadow of No Towers: Reading Virilio in the Twenty-First Century Author(s): Patrick M. Bray Source: Yale French Studies, No. , Writing and. In the Shadow of No Towers is Spiegelman's follow-up to Maus. Both books share similar motifs including (but not limited to): narratives of temporality & seriality;. The Temporalities that Inhabit Spiegelman's In the Shadow of No Towers. In this paper I will investigate Art Spiegelman's In the Shadow of No Towers, a.
|Language:||English, Spanish, German|
|Genre:||Health & Fitness|
|ePub File Size:||27.36 MB|
|PDF File Size:||10.64 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
Read In The Shadow Of No Towers comic online free and high quality. Fast loading speed, unique reading type: All pages - just need to scroll to read next page. Sep 7, For Art Spiegelman, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Maus, the terrorist attacks of September 11, were both highly personal and. For Art Spiegelman, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Maus, the terrorist attacks of September 11, were both highly personal and intensely political.
How poor was he? I have to admit I didn't "get" everything he was writing - perhaps because I wasn't there. Even if the story threatens to explode this container? That tragedy WAS highjacked by the right, and the American public was hoodwinke I have read several reviews on here that mock Art Spiegelman as "The King" or call his book pretentious or get angry over the fact that it's short or too large in size. In stead ofa democracy foundedon theelection of representativeschosen by thevoice of thepeople, expert spin doctorsmanipulate public opin ion Nixon's "silentmajority" in order to instate a regimeofmarket research: Jul 28, Panoramaisland rated it liked it Shelves: Both Spiegelman's talent and Spiegelman's hubris are quite present in this collection - the latter unfortunately moreso than the former.
Cinema functionsthrough thephenomenon ofpersistence ofvision,where theviewer perceives the24 separate still framesflashingper second as a continual, smooth movement; for Virilio, thefilmor television spectator,and thereforeall of us, becomes a "picnolept," giving up a littlebit of consciousness multiple times a second.
The illusion of real timepresence createdby cinema or televisionmasks a real,and nearly constant,disappearance ofperception. As Virilio remindsus inLa machine de vision,August Rodin andHenri Bergson,among others,warned against the "objectiv ity" of photographic and cinematic images, since they artificially freezemoving objects and thusdistort the truenature of time as dura tion Virilio compiles a formidablebody ofevidence toargue thatthehu man observer isprogressivelydenied any agency invision.
From police work to scientificobservation, fromcinema tomilitary surveillance, the cyclopean camera lens 1'objectifinFrench has taken over as the This content downloaded from Vision is now de pendent onmachines forthe lightcapturednot only by a photographic lens,but also by thepixel of a computer screen,which no longerhas anybasis in thenaturalworld.
Computers convertdata intoan assem blage of pixels, producing a synthesisof informationthatamounts to nothingmore than a "statistical image," and thus is a "rational illu sion" In thenear future,according toVirilio,machines will pro duce images forothermachines, and artificial intelligencewill render human perceptionobsolete.
ART AND FEAR Given Virilio's indictmentof thecontemporaryoptical regime,his cri tique of theart establishment's failure to interrogatethenature of im ages and to resist theirdisappearance is,not surprisingly, passionate.
The apparent extravaganceofVirilio's arguments inhis books on con temporaryart seeks toprovehis point thatmodernityhas createda new artisticorthodoxy,one thathas created a remarkablestandardization ofopinion andwhere any critique,especially his own, is automatically deemed "reactionary.
The day contemporaryart recognizes itselfas a casualty ofwar, we can start talkingagain" The terrorand thehorror Viriliogoes so faras to say "pitilessness" depicted incontemporaryart, insteadofhealing the traumaofmodernity, furtheralienate the individual from what would be amore authentic relationship to the act of viewing.
Justasmedia technology cinema, television, and computer screens ,produced an "aesthetic ofdisappearance" and aworld fullofpicnolepts, thevisual artsmake objects disappear now that "presentation" obscures "repre sentation" Virilio, Art and Fear, trans.
Julie Rose London: Continuum, , Semiotext e , , BRAY 9 A representationmaintains the traceof an absent object towhich it refersanalogously, thusaffirming both itsvisual resemblance and its temporal and spatial difference. For Virilio, the currentmedia envi ronment,especially as evidenced in advertising,promotes a "Darwin ism" of images,where only the strongest,or "most efficient,"can sur vive Discours sur l'horreur de l'art, Mechanical images, produced bymotors and computers, tend to be themost spectacular and luminous, eclipsing all others 20, and also Virilio's L'art du moteur.
Consequently, the speed of transmission increases to the pointwhere thereisno longerany "representation"possible, but only "presentation.
Virilio targetsthe "audio-visual," datingback to the emergence of "talkingpictures," as one of themain culprits forthe "presentative" turnof images. Though sound cinemamay be an arbitrary, and not en tirelyconvincing, symptomof the "sonorization" of thevisual arts, it allows Virilio tomake the argument fora clean breakwith the past startingwith The JazzSinger in InArt and Fear the translation of his "Espace critique" work La procedure silence from , he makes thecase that thevisual arts are forcedtobe viewed at the speed of sound and devoid of the silence required forcontemplation, since "image tracks"are accompanied, as theyalways arenow,with a sound track to thepoint ofhavingMuzak pumped into elevators andmuse ums.
Silence, alongwith all of art history's "silent" art objects mu rals,sculpture,painting,etc.
When silence "loses itsvoice," representationalimages fadeaway tobe replacedby thevirtual images of presentation. Virilio's blanket critique of all of 9.
Though the themes of traces, absence, and presence would seem to allow for a di alogue between his work and that of Jacques Derrida, Virilio admits that "This is a ma jor philosophical phenomenon. I have spoken with Jacques Derrida about this; he con tests the term telling me 'presentation,' it isn't that, etc.
Oddly, Virilio's is only defense to claim that, since he is not a philosopher, he feels no obligation to be bound by philosophical debates, but only by his own observations. Is there only a difference in terminology? In fact, Derrida's unquoted critique may have con cerned, I suspect, Virilio's too hastily constructed dichotomy and hierarchy between "representation" and "presentation," which I question later in this essay through the practice of "reading the accident.
Inparticular,Virilio claims thatno theoristhas worked on the impactof sound on art,"not evenDeleuze" TheAccident ofArt, Yet Gilles Deleuze's Cinema 2, L'image temps shows convincingly thatavant-gardepostwar cinema reverses cinematic time's dependence on movement by, among other tech niques, creatingillogicalbreaks between the imageand sound tracks.
Whatever themerit ofVirilio's argumentconcerning sound and art might be, he persuasively links the idea of a "presentative" artwith what he sees as thedisappearance of representationaldernocracy. In stead ofa democracy foundedon theelection of representativeschosen by thevoice of thepeople, expert spin doctorsmanipulate public opin ion Nixon's "silentmajority" in order to instate a regimeofmarket research: At the end of themillennium, what abstraction once tried to pull off is in fact being accomplished before our very eyes: A situation that reinforces the dreadful decline of rep resentative democracy in favor of a democracy based on the rule of opinion, in anticipation of the imminent arrival of virtual democracy, some kind of "direct democracy" or, more precisely, a presentative multi-media democracy based on automatic polling.
Art and Fear, 35 Political discourse fine-tunes its public image in order to influence daily opinion polls, thusbypassing thevotingbooth. The succession of incrediblyclose American presidential elections in and , when the candidates' platformsdiffered markedly, attests to the suc cess of the newly adapted statistical science of "presentativemulti media democracy.
Gilles Deleuze, Cin?
L'image-temps Paris: BRAY 11 analogous or representative images. The "optically correct" is even more insidious than its antecedent, political counterpart,as its real timeprogressionhides theverypossibility of dissent and alternative images do not pass themedia filter To claim thatwe live in a "civilization of the image," is, forVirilio, false; forwhat is at stake is theoptical, thedanger in "givingvision to amachine" TheAccident ofArt, We must learn to see in the in tervalbetween frames,to tearperception away fromtechnologyin or der to rendervisible the invisible, the "never-before-seen"ofmechan icalvision Writing,writingwith images,resituatesthebody at the centerofperceptionand restorestheelement ofdeferredtime lostwith the real timecommunication of the screen DerDerian, "An interview with Paul Virilio".
A rehabilitationof the imageexposes theblindness caused by visionmachines, affirmsrepresentationagainst the imme diacy of "presentative"art,allowing fortheperceptionof theaccident leftin thewake of technologicalprogress. His knowledge of architecture and technologymakes him uniquely placed to analyze current situations and propose solutions that reachbeyond the fatalistic.
Increasingly,he has developed a the ory of theaccident intended to expose and eventually predict thehid den side of technological "progress": This catastrophic information is a new knowledge, one that is hidden: The AccidentofArt, In fact,afterthe firstWorld Trade Center attacks, in ,Virilio was called in as an expert, ifeccentric, consultant to evaluate the ca tastrophe.
What he foundwas that the damage done could have been worse: The image resultingfromthecollapse of the towersbenefitedfromthe instantaneous and globalmedia com plex, escalating a local attack into a global accident.
In a dromocraticand technological society,where theattention of thepublic is relentlesslyfocusedon thepresent,accidents are becom ingmore and more frequent,and, thepotential for theiroccurrence more certain.
It is,precisely, thepredictabilityofwhat was once con sideredcontingent thatallows fora recognitionof theaccident; as Vir iliowrites in an inversionofAristotle, if"the accident reveals the sub stance" then the invention of the "substance" also invents its own "accident. The discovery of the techno logical,as opposed to thenatural accident is awork of theunconscious, an "invention" in theetymological sense of thediscovery ofwhat has been hidden fromview Aided by the"presentative"media and the rapid pace of technological transformations,accidents remain "hid den" until catastropheshappen accidens as Virilio point out, derives from"what happens" inLatin.
In , Virilio organized,with thehelp of theFondation Cartier pour l'art contemporain, themulti-media exhibition "Ce qui arrive" with the alternativeEnglish title "Unknown Quantity" , which de veloped theprototypeor precursor forhis long-termdesire to founda "Museum ofAccidents.
Virilio, L'accident originel Paris: BRAY 13 plus etre simplement expose 'al'accident". Virilio's project fora "Mu seum ofAccidents" could reconnect thepresent of theaccident to the past of its invention,revealing finallywhat remainedhidden, uncon scious, toa public enamoredby therapiddevelopment ofprogress.
Such amuseum, or at least a legaldepositoryof technological failure,by the sheer forceof its simple yet effectiveimages,would, Virilio seems to hope, lead to a questioning of all new technologiesand a public aware ness of the futureaswell as of thepast. The documents fromthe INA have in commonwith theworks of art in the exhibition a certain emotional distance fromthe events theyrepresent.
There are fewbodies and lit tleblood, especially consideringthat the subjectmatter consists of the worst catastrophesof the twentiethand twenty-first centuries.
In this sense,Virilio's disapproval of fearand horrorin arthas been respected; however,many of the installationshave sound tracks;even the sculp ture designed for themain exhibition space, The Fall by Lebbeus Woods, is accompanied by a piece by the sound artistStephenVitiello. Most of theart remainsconceptual and, itcould be argued,rathercon ventional. Instead,or at least alongside, of themuseum practice of collecting and exhibitingaccidents,what isurgentlyneeded is a newway of look ing that could read the accident in the image.
That all images, from From the official website of the Fondation Cartier the English version presents a different translation: David Rodowick, inparticular,has examined thestatus of the image incinema and newmedia, analyzing thehistory of aesthetics in order to definewhat he calls the "figural": Such a per spectiveconfrontsthe imageof thepresentwith itsfutureaccident, cre ating a sortof "time-crystal"inwhich would be seen thebifurcationof time intopast and future.
The troublingexperience ofpersistence ofvision and en duringabsence depicted inArt Spiegelman's graphicnovel, In the Shadow ofNo Towers, has become our new postmodern condition as theorizedby Paul Virilio. A single image haunts Spiegelman afterhe witnessed first-handthecollapse of thenorth tower: Duke University Press, , The concept of the "time-crystal" was most fully developed by Deleuze in his Cin?
Since the past is constituted not after the present that itwas but at the same time, time has to split itself in two at each moment as present and past, which differ from each other in nature, or what amounts to the same thing, it has to split the present in two heterogeneous directions, one of which is launched towards the future. Time consists of this while the other falls into the past.
The Time Image, trans.
Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta Minneapolis: University ofMinnesota Press, , Fairouz uses a comfortably mundane opening theme to evoke a triptych of panels depicting a family watching television before, during and after the attacks.
Bombast erupts midway through, after which the initial theme resumes, warped with dissonances and crowned with a funereal trumpet solo played eloquently here by Janis Porietis. He belongs to the Composer Tribe a group that devotes itself to keeping time, while we comix artits find ways to represent time spatially.
He emerges from the rubble with a very tony piece of highbrow cartoon music. The events are not seen but they are understood. The music begins by depicting the electronic monotony of the first panel.
Everything is the same, but not quite. Like the graphic sequence, it relies on limited colors that are selected from the larger ensemble. It is music of deep reflection and, like the sequence, reads in descending order. Much of my music has dealt with issues of self-representation and this mournful movement captures this poignant and conflicted sentiment that I felt in the aftermath as a New Yorker and an American of Arabic heritage.
In this movement which begins with grotesquely Souza-esque gestures from the Red Zone dovetailing into a resistance from the Blue Zone, the music of each band is pitted relentlessly against the other with the two sides not listening to one another.
The two musics sometimes comment on one another while sometimes they shout over each other to form a cacophony.
This is my most explicit critique of loud nationalism. There is a moment in this movement however where the two sides come together to sound as one in an over-the-top exultation of patriotism complete with sounding bells and whistles before diverging again to the same rhetoric and finally spinning out of control to a tumultuous conclusion.
It is, in its first part, inspired by the following graphic detail about the passage of time and the ticking of a time- bomb.