"Introduction" to Jean Baudrillard, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. Paul Patton. Loading Preview. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download. DownloadBaudrillard the gulf war did not take place pdf. Free Pdf Download vbs Object is locked skipped The course lasts approximately three months and. The Gulf War did not take place is a collection of three essays that Jean Baudrillard originally wrote for the magazine Liberation, during the months of January.
|Language:||English, Spanish, French|
|ePub File Size:||15.44 MB|
|PDF File Size:||13.58 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
TheGulfWar did not take place. Jean paudrillard. Translated and with an introduction by. Paul Patton This is why the Gulf War will not take place. It is neither. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place is a collection of three short essays by Jean Baudrillard Print/export. Create a book · Download as PDF · Printable version. Request PDF on ResearchGate | The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. | In a provocative analysis written during the unfolding drama of
Context is important in reading this book otherwise you won't get a lot out of it. East Dane Designer Men's Fashion. Moreover, rather than the 'revolution' of real time of which Virilio speaks, we should speak of an involution in real time; of an involution of the event in the instanteneity of everything at once, and of its vanishing in information itself. Lists with This Book. This page was last edited on 6 April , at Patton's introduction argues that Baudrillard, more than any other critic of the Gulf War, correctly identified the stakes involved in In a provocative analysis written during the unfolding drama of , Baudrillard draws on his concepts of simulation and the hyperreal to argue that the Gulf War did not take place but was a carefully scripted media event--a "virtual" war.
Be meteorologically sensitive to stupidity" " And then we have this gem of bullshit: This is sheer ignorance and destructive. Mar 27, ufsb rated it really liked it Shelves: Jan 31, Tash added it. I understood all these words separately but together not so much. View 2 comments. Apr 05, Andrew Childers rated it liked it. Definitely interesting. Baudrillard made a couple of solid points in an un-solid manner; it seemed that the author of the introduction explained Baudrillard's points better than himself.
Sep 09, David rated it did not like it. The Emperor has no clothes. If you boil off the seemingly non-sensical claims like, y'know, the title the book's alleged insights are, while not wrong, deeply and utterly banal. I don't know whether this piece by crazy French theorist Jean Baudrillard Died recently is faulty in its logic or if I am just not capable of comprehending what the hell he is trying to say.
He wrote 3 lengthy articles for a French publication and a few years later they were translated by a University of Wisconsin proffessor and compiled into a page book.
Obviously, the title assumes something that is just not so, meaning, the gulf war DID take place. When a Kuwaiti friend of mine saw the b I don't know whether this piece by crazy French theorist Jean Baudrillard Died recently is faulty in its logic or if I am just not capable of comprehending what the hell he is trying to say.
When a Kuwaiti friend of mine saw the book in my room he commented "ohh really, thats not what I thought when I lived in Kuwait during the war.
The title is just for shock value, and if you are already known as a crazy theorist, and French for that matter, I guess you can get away with that. What he is really saying is that The Gulf War was interpreted differently by the rest of the world because of American media's misrepresentation of it. I guess that title didn't fly. This compilation is probably the most confusing piece of writing I have ever encountered because it is translated, Baudrillard is crazy, and I don't know much about the Gulf War.
I don't recommend this to anyone that doesn't enjoy academic reading as a puzzle that you have to tinker with for hours on end I like it more as a challenge Apr 20, Joe Mecham rated it it was amazing. I may just be easy to please, as I haven't read much philosophy, but Baudrillard just does not leave me disappointed. His almost poetic writing style is the perfect form of delivery for this type of novel, as it is articulate and clear, yet ironic and suspenseful.
My favorite quote: Interminable shit kicker. The hysteric cannot be crushed: Confronted by a hysteric, the other becomes paranoid, he deploys a massive appar I may just be easy to please, as I haven't read much philosophy, but Baudrillard just does not leave me disappointed. Confronted by a hysteric, the other becomes paranoid, he deploys a massive apparatus of protection and mistrust.
He suspects the hysteric of bad faith, of ruse and dissimulation. He wants to constrain him to the truth and to transparency. The hysteric is irreducible. He means are decoys and the overturning of alliances. Confronted with this lubricity, this duplicity, the paranoid can only become more rigid, more obsessional. The most violent reproach addresses to Saddam Hussein by Bush is that of being a liar, a traitor, a bad player, a trickster.
Lying son of a bitch! Saddam, like a good hysteric, has never given birth to his own war: By contrast, he has until now succeeded in preventing Bush from giving birth to his. And, with the complicity of Gorbachev, he almost succeeded in fucking him up the ass. But the hysteric is not suicidal, this is the advantageous other side to Saddam.
He is neither mad nor suicidal, perhaps he should be treated by hypnosis? A really really great book that went sailing straight over the head of many American critics who wondered how someone could deny that a war had taken place. Baudrillards' thesis runs something like; a war did not take place in that, firstly there are usually two sides in a war, capabale of having one.
Secondly the war that did take place was completely removed from the standard notion of a war. A war as a media event, a spectacle created to support a sense of a palpable enemy and a just cause.
Wh A really really great book that went sailing straight over the head of many American critics who wondered how someone could deny that a war had taken place. When read against Der Derians Virtuous War, one realizes how close to the mark Baudrillard is, especially in light of Schwarzkopfs acquisition of a war game, which became the blueprint for America.
Context is important in reading this book otherwise you won't get a lot out of it. Persevere however and the practical applications are well worth it. Aug 05, Mike rated it it was amazing. The title refers to the U. War as videogame distraction from the suffering it inflicts. Combat as a media event. There is good reason for that. Oddly enough I recently came across a not-too-bad, positive review of this book in the National Review.
Go figure. Apr 03, Anna added it Shelves: Still, some provocative ideas. Mar 10, Ben Flanagan rated it really liked it. Can't wait for the movie. Feb 23, Peter Heft rated it really liked it. Just re-read the book and I still think it's great. I do think Baudrillard gets a bit side tracked as is his nature and is obviously much less than lucid, but Patton's introduction is top notch. Apr 05, Stu rated it liked it Shelves: This text is every bit as prescient, interesting, and difficult as I remember it being.
Thank goodness for Paul Patton's fluid translation and indispensable introduction; summarizing Baudrillard's thinking is no easy undertaking, not if one seeks to do him any sort of justice, and Patton explains in mostly clear, digestible language just what it means to put forth the seemingly audacious claim that the Gulf War did not take place.
Skip the introduction at your own peril. That said, there is This text is every bit as prescient, interesting, and difficult as I remember it being. That said, there is still a somewhat steep learning curve at play here. Baudrillard uses words such as "real" and "virtual" in idiosyncratic ways that may not be immediately comprehensible to those unfamiliar with his works hell, even those who are familiar tend to struggle , and any sort of philosophizing that relies on paradoxical, counter-intuitive claims about "reality" is bound to alienate some potential readers, especially those with low tolerances for semantic trickery.
In a way—read: Isolate a single shot or scene from Twin Peaks , say, and try to analyze it. It isn't easy! It may appear incomprehensible, garbled, "weird for the sake of being weird," etc. But set in the context of the entire show Same with Baudrillard: So what is this text about? Well, succinct summary is nigh impossible, at least given my analytical limitations, so let's instead say it is about a bevy of intersecting ideas: Victorious or not, American armaments will have acquired an unequaled technological label".
And that just scratches the surface. Mar 08, Graham rated it liked it Shelves: Not a bad trio of essays, though they do tend a bit towards repetition by the time you reach the third. Paul Patton's introduction is a very good primer, as well. He summarizes Baundrillard's thesis as "In the past, war has always involved an a Not a bad trio of essays, though they do tend a bit towards repetition by the time you reach the third.
He summarizes Baundrillard's thesis as "In the past, war has always involved an antagonistic and destructive conflict between adversaries, a dual relation between warring parties. In several respects, this was not the case in the Gulf conflict.
There are many great turns of phrase, but few echo as loudly and obviously as what Baudrillard wrote in his first essay, "The Gulf War Will Not Take Place": We should have been suspicious about the disappearance of the declaration of war, the disappearance of the symbolic passage to the act, which already presaged the disappearance of the end of hostilities, then of the distinction between winners and losers the winner readily becomes the hostage of the loser: Since it never began, this war is therefore interminable.
Much of Baudrillard's writing refers to the brevity of the conflict, the speed with which the Iraqi military disintegrated, and the frustration that it wasn't a more "obvious" war, a climax denied, the coitus interruptus of conflict. He compares Hussein to a "rug salesman," facing off against an "arms salesman," whose "entire strategy rests upon de-escalation one sets a maximal price then descends from it in stages.
Thus, Saddam disappears without further ado. And given the "Phony War"-esque nature of the next decade, leading up to round 2 of the endless invasion of Iraq, did it really?
May 07, vi macdonald rated it it was amazing Shelves: It's one thing to scare yourself shitless with conspiracy bullshit. It's another thing entirely to scare yourself shitless with the realisation that the modern media landscape and the 24 hour news cycle has done terrible things to our ability to process actual human tragedy in a post-cold war society.
Jesus Christ, we're all fucked.
Oct 11, Michael Winters rated it really liked it. Dec 13, Nativeabuse rated it did not like it. Neat concept, bad execution. I liked reading about the topic of this book and philosophical ideas behind it better than reading the actual book.
Which is a real shame. These are essays originally published to be stand alone in magazines, so they read really awkwardly. Overall not a very pleasant experience to read. Oct 16, Daria rated it it was amazing.
Baudrillard is a genius. A postmodern prophet. Dec 25, Archit rated it really liked it. Excellent read; at times, felt similar to an account of molestation. Jul 16, David Daugherty rated it really liked it. A little hard to follow for a layman, but nonetheless a fascinating look at what effect the media has on the reality of modern "warfare".
Feb 09, Dean added it. Post-modern thinking at its finest. Sep 30, Tom Douglas rated it liked it. The idea that a war can occur as a purely visceral, mental experience is super cool. That's the summary. View 1 comment. Apr 28, Alison rated it it was ok. I'm sure I was supposed to get more out of this than I did, but really Mar 22, Omnipotent Dystopian Now rated it really liked it Shelves: The Apocalypse: We do not have the means to re-establish the truth.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Readers Also Enjoyed.
About Jean Baudrillard. Jean Baudrillard. Jean Baudrillard was a French sociologist, philosopher, cultural theorist, political commentator, and photographer.
His work is frequently associated with postmodernism and post-structuralism. Before hostilities had even begun, both sides had run innumerable computer simulations of pertinent variables.
By changing one variable, one outcome emerged. By changing another, a newer outcome resulted. These outcomes looked real and sounded real to those writing the programming.
A variable reality was created that could not be distinguished from the eventual real thing. It is this relentless focus on the creation of simulacra that had been the obsession of Baudrillard for nearly twenty years. The original title of each is telling. In that war real soldiers simply sat around for months waiting for orders to shoot. In this war, there was real shooting all right. Real people were killed and many buildings were blown up.
So how dare Baudrillard defame and dishonor the dead on both sides by calling the "war" no more than a Playstation computer run? His response: From start to finish, from the first shot to the last, the Gulf War was pre-planned right down to a paper clip. Things ran so smoothly that even the Joint Chiefs were amazed. War rarely co-operates by being predictable. But in this case it was. The images of the fighting were sent in real time to America's television sets by CNN.
The reality of the fighting precisely coalesced into what Baudrillard termed the simulacra of war. It looked much more savage than it was. From this delving into a war once removed from reality, Baudrillard called it a non-event. Many critics objected, thinking that by "non-event" he meant a hoax.
But Baudrillard had a motivation that transcended semantic distinctions. For him, he wished to publicize the Dawn of a New Day, one that had long been in existence but only now paradoxically were the images of a false reality emerging from the shadows of an all too real entrenched apathy. In his earlier books, Baudrillard had described how signs had slowly begun disconnecting from their moorings.
The image of a thing now was thought to exist in its own right. The "copy" was now indistinguishable from the "original.
It is this fear that humanity has already come perilously close to this insane world that motivated Baudrillard to write The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. Provacativively titled book either impresses or deeply angers people, I read this years ago and retained only a few points of interest. Yes, the war happened, as in bombs were dropped, people died, buildings were destroyed, many suffered, etc. But it differed markedly from previous wars in that it was mainly an event to be manipulated by different sides in the media.
Therefore, it did not take place the way previous wars had, in that the suffering and even a uniform understanding did not penetrate the population at home who watched the events on CNN.
Unfortunately, all of this business about the 'realness' of the war, and the simulacra, and the hyper-reality we're now mired in, is written in a frustrating and unnecessarily bloated style that makes even this slim work a slight chore at times. Can certainly be expressed in a simpler way, therefore appearing less profound, but then it wouldn't be the work of French postmodern philosopher.
Interesting 'take' on a modern war, with points that would only resonate more in the years since, it's hit-or-miss for most readers of current events more for the philosophy crowd. This book basically describes how the first Iraq war differed from traditional wars of the past. It is not for everyone, Baudrillard has the unfortunate position of being too loose with ideas to be taken very seriously by 'real' academics while at the same time writing in a style that is not easily accessible to a popular audience.
His thesis is that the 'war' was primarily a media event that was useful in different ways to both sides of the conflict. He does not dispute that violence and suffering took place, but suggests that the event was not a war as was defined in the past by Clausewitz.
Any review that states he is trying to 'hide' the essential suffering of those at the ground of the event is just wrong. There is nothing in the book that questions or calls into doubt the experiences of soldiers or civilians; at the same time it does not dwell upon them. Served as my intro to Baudrillard's work and a brilliant entrance at that.
Insightful as always, cutting, pulling no punches as he presents the interface for what it is. Some of the poetry is lost going from French to English, but in the absense of the one pick up the other. This text describes and defines the relations between the dominant states USA Western Europe , the media and the wars they choose to have. Wonderful read and learn. See all 12 reviews. Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.
Learn more about Amazon Giveaway. This item: Set up a giveaway. Customers who viewed this item also viewed.
The System of Objects Radical Thinkers. Simulations Foreign Agents Series. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Learn more about Amazon Prime. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Back to top. Get to Know Us. Amazon Payment Products. English Choose a language for shopping.
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.
Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally.